The National Mental Health Association Rejects Ex-Gays

Related Entries

A Summary and Analysis of The War on Psychotherapy: When Sexual Politics, Gender Ideology, and Mental Health Collide

The War on Psychotherapy: When Sexual Politics, Gender Ideology, and Mental Health Collide is Mr. Doyle’s first book. Dr. Michelle Cretella’s superb preface to the book is worth the purchase price. Regarding transitioning and the institutions which promote it in children, Cretella says, “These harms constitute nothing less than institutionalized child abuse.” In the forward, Dr. Michael Brown makes it clear that Doyle is approaching this issue from a Christian viewpoint. Doyle, who fifteen years previously experienced a shift in his sexual orientation, proclaims, “As a licensed psychotherapist, I have dedicated my life’s work to helping individuals and families come to terms with their sexual and gender
identity and be able to understand how to make choices in their sexual behavior without compromising their personal and spiritual values.”

Guidelines for the Practice of Sexual Attraction Fluidity Exploration in Therapy

Many significant developments have occurred in the field of same-sex sexuality in the decade since the Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity (ATCSI) introduced the first edition of its Practice Guidelines (ATCSI, 2010). These developments necessitated that the guidelines be updated to address the professional and legal realities that face therapists who assist individuals in exploring the fluidity of their unwanted same-sex attractions and behavior. The revised Guidelines incorporate the now preferred language of sexual attraction fluidity exploration in therapy1 (SAFE-T) as the most accurate description of contemporary professional clinical intervention with these individuals.

The Reincarnation of Shidlo and Shroeder (2002): New Studies Introduce Anti-SOCE Advocacy Research to the Next Generation

This review examines three recent research studies that are being utilized professionally and politically to support broad claims of the ineffectiveness and harm
of SOCE. These conclusions are deemed unjustifiable given a host of methodological problems. Paramount among these concerns are highly nonrepresentative samples, compromised outcome measures, and the confounding of the various forms of SOCE under study. As a consequence, generalizing the findings of these studies beyond the immediate participants is as problematic as claiming that the findings obtained from divorced clients who earlier participated in marital therapy provides a valid representation of outcomes for the therapeutic care of distressed marriages.