Expert Opinion on the Constitutional Meaning of ‘Sex’ and ‘Gender’: Medical Gender Affirming Treatment case No. 6 of 2021, Bulgarian Constitutional Court [BG]

Published Response, 2021Page(s) 43

Expert Opinion on the Constitutional Meaning of 'Sex' and 'Gender': Medical Gender Affirming Treatment case No. 6 of 2021, Bulgarian Constitutional Court -<br /> BG

Article information

Topics:

General, Uncategorized

Author:

Dr. Laura Haynes
Health and Human Services Section 1557 Proposed Amendment That Would Erase Conscience Rights for Physicians—Opposed. Testimony presented on behalf of the IFTCC to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the White House Office of Management and Business (OMB). Attended by representatives of the OMB and of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Testimony in the state of Minnesota, USA, for the Preventive Health Policy Division Hearing, House of Representatives
Canadian Government submission: C-4 Opposed, International Federation for Therapeutic and Counselling Choice
Evidence of Serious Harmful Implications of Therapy Bans
Expert Opinion on the Constitutional Meaning of ‘Sex’ and ‘Gender’: Medical Gender Affirming Treatment case No. 6 of 2021, Bulgarian Constitutional Court [BG]
Expert Opinion on the Constitutional Meaning of ‘Sex’ and ‘Gender’: Medical Gender Affirming Treatment case No. 6 of 2021, Bulgarian Constitutional Court [EN]
IFTCC Letter to Canadian MPs Nov 2020
IFTCC Submission to New Zealand Government’s Proposed “Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Bill” September 2021
IFTCC to UN HRC individual Submission to Victor Madrigal-Borloz
Letter to New Zealand Justice Select Committee 24th September 2021
Submission to the Norwegian Government on the “Oppose Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Bill”, 15.10.2021
TESTIMONY OPPOSING MINNESOTA HF16 THERAPY BAN BILL

Related Entries