Canadian Government submission: C-4 Opposed, International Federation for Therapeutic and Counselling Choice

Published Response, 2021Page(s) 4

Article information

Topics:

Client Self-Determination or RightsConversion TherapyCultureDiscriminationEvaluation for TherapyFamily DynamicsGender DysphoriaGender IdentityGender Identity DisorderHomosexualityIdentityIdeologyMarriageMedical Issues and HomosexualityMental HealthOpposition to TherapyReligionSame Sex AttractionSexual OrientationSources of HelpSuppression of DebateTherapyTherapy or TreatmentTransgenderTransgenderism

Author:

Dr. Laura Haynes
Health and Human Services Section 1557 Proposed Amendment That Would Erase Conscience Rights for Physicians—Opposed. Testimony presented on behalf of the IFTCC to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the White House Office of Management and Business (OMB). Attended by representatives of the OMB and of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Testimony in the state of Minnesota, USA, for the Preventive Health Policy Division Hearing, House of Representatives
Canadian Government submission: C-4 Opposed, International Federation for Therapeutic and Counselling Choice
Evidence of Serious Harmful Implications of Therapy Bans
Expert Opinion on the Constitutional Meaning of ‘Sex’ and ‘Gender’: Medical Gender Affirming Treatment case No. 6 of 2021, Bulgarian Constitutional Court [BG]
Expert Opinion on the Constitutional Meaning of ‘Sex’ and ‘Gender’: Medical Gender Affirming Treatment case No. 6 of 2021, Bulgarian Constitutional Court [EN]
IFTCC Letter to Canadian MPs Nov 2020
IFTCC Submission to New Zealand Government’s Proposed “Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Bill” September 2021
IFTCC to UN HRC individual Submission to Victor Madrigal-Borloz
Letter to New Zealand Justice Select Committee 24th September 2021
Submission to the Norwegian Government on the “Oppose Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Bill”, 15.10.2021
TESTIMONY OPPOSING MINNESOTA HF16 THERAPY BAN BILL
IFTCC Testimony Opposing Oregon HB2458 Therapy Ban for Adults 2023
OPEN LETTER TO MINNESOTA LEGISLATORS IN OPPOSITION TO HB2280 GENDER (TRANSITION) AFFIRMING RIGHTS ACT
IFTCC Testimony in Opposition to AB957 Family Law, Gender Identity as Amended March 13, 2023
TESTIMONY OPPOSING MICHIGAN THERAPY BAN CONSIDERATION
TESTIMONY OPPOSING MICHIGAN THERAPY BAN CONSIDERATION – ABBREVIATED REFERENCES
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION FOR THERAPEUTIC AND COUNSELLING CHOICE TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION TO LD1735 (MAINE), Gender Health Care
Private: trial
AB 957 – OPPOSED FOR CALIFORNIA
IFTCC Opposed to AB 665 Minors Consent to Mental Health Services – Letter to CA Senators
IFTCC Opposes US Proposed Rule to Place LGBT Foster Children Only With LGBT Affirming Foster Parents
Professional Organisations Against the Banning of Therapeutic Choice
Why is the NI Department for Communities using Public Money to Promote the LGBT Agenda?
Submission of the IFTCC to the World Health Organisation
Response to Emily Sargent’s ‘Invited’ Investigation In The Times On Former LGB-Identified Persons Who Benefit From Change Allowing Therapy
Response to Emily Sargent’s ‘Invited’ Investigation In The Times On Former LGB-Identified Persons Who Benefit From Change Allowing Therapy
Testimony of the IFTCC to West Virginia Legislators: Gender Medical Interventions Do Not Prevent Suicides in Adolescents
IFTCC Science and Research Council Response to Scottish Government
Protected: Haynes, Laura April 2024 Therapy Bans are an Unscientific Disaster – Full Briefing
Protected: Supplementary Document on the Benefits of Therapeutic Interventions Argued by the IFTCC
Protected: Expert Report on The Coalition against Conversion Therapy Memorandum of Understanding on Conversation Therapy In the UK
Protected: IFTCC Contribution to UK Government Goals 18 April 2024
Dr. Ann Gillies
Canadian Government submission: C-4 Opposed, International Federation for Therapeutic and Counselling Choice
IFTCC Letter to Canadian MPs Nov 2020
Davidson, Michael Ph.D.
Freedom of speech to articulate alternative, non-affirming responses to homosexuality is an important right to be protected
Ostracising difference: the new ideology of professional psychotherapeutic bodies that shame, and expel members who support autonomous individuals, seeking help to achieve personal emancipation, by reducing unwanted same-sex attractions aligned with personal values
Marking the growth of intolerance towards the religious orthodox in the United Kingdom who reject state collusion with gay advocacy ideologies which threaten personal and religious autonomy and freedoms of expression
Protecting Competent Professional Guidance and Therapeutic Care for Unwanted Sexual Feelings
Viewpoint Discrimination: The UK governments’ determination to disallow contrary views around the discredited idea that sexual preference in inborn
Out of Harm’s Way: Working Ethically with Same-sex Attracted Persons
The Right to Decide: Seeking justice for choices around unwanted same-sex attractions.
A Response to the UK Government’s Intended Ban on Therapeutic Choice
Canadian Government submission: C-4 Opposed, International Federation for Therapeutic and Counselling Choice
Extract from the submission to the UK Government’s Consultation on Conversion Therapy
IFTCC Letter to Canadian MPs Nov 2020
IFTCC Statement on Legislative Proposal of the German Bundestag (4th May 2020) English
IFTCC Submission to New Zealand Government’s Proposed “Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Bill” September 2021
IFTCC to UN HRC individual Submission to Victor Madrigal-Borloz
Letter to Doug Beattie, MLA NI Assembly on “Conversion Therapy” Ban
Letter to New Zealand Justice Select Committee 24th September 2021
Submission to the Norwegian Government on the “Oppose Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Bill”, 15.10.2021
CIT – A Biblical Theology for Helping LGBT and Former LGBT Persons
Why is the NI Department for Communities using Public Money to Promote the LGBT Agenda?
Letter to Department for Communities (NI) – Public Money Being Used for Biased LGBT+ Research

Related Entries