A Response to the UK Government’s Intended Ban on Therapeutic Choice

Published Response, 2018Page(s) 27

Article information

Topics:

Born GayChangeClient Self-Determination or RightsConversion TherapyCounseling Process or TechniquesCultureDiscriminationEnvironmental Factors In DevelopmentEvaluation for TherapyHomosexualityIdentityIdeologyLesbianismMental HealthNon-heterosexualityOpposition to TherapyReligionSame Sex AttractionScience Vs PoliticsSexual BehaviorSexual OrientationSuppression of DebateTherapyTherapy or TreatmentUnwanted Same-sex Attractions

Author:

Davidson, Michael Ph.D.
Freedom of speech to articulate alternative, non-affirming responses to homosexuality is an important right to be protected
Ostracising difference: the new ideology of professional psychotherapeutic bodies that shame, and expel members who support autonomous individuals, seeking help to achieve personal emancipation, by reducing unwanted same-sex attractions aligned with personal values
Marking the growth of intolerance towards the religious orthodox in the United Kingdom who reject state collusion with gay advocacy ideologies which threaten personal and religious autonomy and freedoms of expression
Protecting Competent Professional Guidance and Therapeutic Care for Unwanted Sexual Feelings
Viewpoint Discrimination: The UK governments’ determination to disallow contrary views around the discredited idea that sexual preference in inborn
Out of Harm’s Way: Working Ethically with Same-sex Attracted Persons
The Right to Decide: Seeking justice for choices around unwanted same-sex attractions.
A Response to the UK Government’s Intended Ban on Therapeutic Choice
Canadian Government submission: C-4 Opposed, International Federation for Therapeutic and Counselling Choice
Extract from the submission to the UK Government’s Consultation on Conversion Therapy
IFTCC Letter to Canadian MPs Nov 2020
IFTCC Statement on Legislative Proposal of the German Bundestag (4th May 2020) English
IFTCC Submission to New Zealand Government’s Proposed “Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Bill” September 2021
IFTCC to UN HRC individual Submission to Victor Madrigal-Borloz
Letter to Doug Beattie, MLA NI Assembly on “Conversion Therapy” Ban
Letter to New Zealand Justice Select Committee 24th September 2021
Submission to the Norwegian Government on the “Oppose Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Bill”, 15.10.2021
CIT – A Biblical Theology for Helping LGBT and Former LGBT Persons
Why is the NI Department for Communities using Public Money to Promote the LGBT Agenda?
Letter to Department for Communities (NI) – Public Money Being Used for Biased LGBT+ Research
Dr. Carys Moseley
Beware leaked government plans on gender ID and ‘conversion therapy’ ban
Believing sexuality can change is now a conscience issue
Beware Mermaids backtracking over ‘born in the wrong body’
Can Wales ban ‘conversion therapy’?
Cass Report makes ‘highly questionable recommendations’
Children at risk if Welsh Government bans ‘conversion therapy’
Concern about girls wanting to be ‘boys’ is a matter of fundamental human dignity
Confronting Stonewall’s weaponisation of Rowan Williams
Conversion Therapy Helpline is ‘state-sanctioned surveillance’
Counselling and psychotherapy have become transgender propaganda mouthpieces
Criminalising ‘conversion therapy’ will backfire
Education sector damaged by ‘conversion therapy’ research
Former Clinicians from Gender Identity Clinic Speak Out
Former senior BBC presenter criticises LGBT correspondent role
Former Tavistock director criticises handling of gender-confused children
Is the Commission for Countering Extremism going to erode freedom of religion and belief?
It’s time there was an investigation into the Gender Identity Development Service for Children and Adolescents
Lessons we can learn from international ‘conversion therapy’ bans
LGBT rights extremism ‘treating children as state property’
Male rape victims would be harmed by ‘conversion therapy’ ban
Northern Ireland Assembly votes hypothetically for ‘conversion therapy’ ban
Press freedom and journalistic integrity eroded by ‘conversion therapy’ bans
Press outlets should beware the Ozanne Foundation Faith & Sexuality Survey
Prime Minister announces plan to ‘ban conversion therapy’
Professing Christians should stop sacralising the trans cult
Scottish Parliament wants to hear views on banning ‘conversion therapy’
Service wants to normalise sado-masochism
Silenced X-Factor Malta ex-gay contestant speaks out
Teens’ porn viewing habits report demands strategic response
Tell election candidates to resist Stonewall demands
The Church of Scotland has lost the mind of Christ
Time for a coronavirus crackdown on RSE indoctrination
Transgender prisoner debate ‘still relevant’
UK is the first country to scrap gender self-identification plan
UN expert report demands ‘conversion therapy’ bans worldwide
Violent porn now a political issue
Welsh pastors at risk of prosecution from ‘conversion therapy’ ban
Why Christians must defeat the global attack on conversion therapy for homosexuality
Why it matters that James Caspian isn’t allowed to study people who regret gender transition
Why the push for same-sex ‘marriage’ in the British Overseas Territories is a cause for global concern
Will ‘conversion therapy’ ban be sneaked into Scottish Hate Crime Bill?
X Factor Malta silences ex-gay singer’s Christian testimony
Ten good reasons not to restrict therapy for unwanted same-sex attraction
Challenging the Stonewall General Election 2017 Manifesto
Ten Good Reasons not to restrict therapy for unwanted same-sex attraction
The UK government is going down a dangerous path in its zeal to ban ‘convertion therapies’
Transgender children and young people: Book review
What might cause Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria?
Why it is so important that the UK government has admitted that trans identification is a belief
Why the ex-gay movement provokes rage and censorship
Why Vue Cinemas is muddled in saying ex-gay film contradicted its ‘values’
Why we must stop the government from outlawing the ex-gay movement
A Response to the UK Government’s Intended Ban on Therapeutic Choice
A Response to the UK Government’s Intended Ban on Therapeutic Choice
Critical analysis of the Ozanne Foundation’s “Faith and Sexuality Survey 2018”
IFTCC to UN HRC individual Submission to Victor Madrigal-Borloz
Rosik, Christopher H. Ph.D.
NARTH Scientific Advisory Board Member Presents At APA Convention
Looking More Deeply at a Study on GLB Substance Use
Further Reflections on The Counseling Psychologist’s Special Issue on Conversion Therapies and Religion
Study Supports the “Weak Father” Theory of Homosexuality
NARTH Member Christopher Rosik Responds to Presbyterian Web Site
Gay Marriage and Human Sexual Nature
Defining Compulsive Behavior
Sociopolitical Diversity in Psychology (Refs)
Thoughts on the Ordination of Sexually Active Gay Men and Lesbians (Refs)
Book Review of Hooked- New Science on How Casual Sex Is Affecting Our Children
Psychological Practice with Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Clients
Did the American Psychological Association’s Report on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation Apply Its Research Standards Consistently?
Spitzer’s “Retraction”: What Does It Really Mean?
California Senate Bill 1172: A Scientific and Legislative Travesty— A Look at the Bill’s Misuse of Science
Fact-Checking California Senate Bill 11721— Serious Inaccuracies and Distortions Abound: Are Politicians Willing to Listen?
The (Complete) Lack of a Scientific Basis for Banning Sexual-Orientation Change Efforts (SOCE) with Minors
Countering a One-Sided Representation of Science: NARTH Provides the “Rest of the Story” for Legal Efforts to Challenge Antisexual Orientation Change Efforts (SOCE) Legislation
The Alliance and NARTH Institute Response to the WMA Statement on Natural Variations of Human Sexuality
The Reincarnation of Shidlo and Shroeder (2002): New Studies Introduce Anti-SOCE Advocacy Research to the Next Generation
Book Review of James E. Phelan’s Successful Outcomes of Sexual Orientation Change Efforts: An Annotated Bibliography
The Quiet Death of Sexual Orientation Immutability: How Science Loses When Political Advocacy Wins
My Conversation with a Typical Opponent of Professional Therapies that Include Change
Alliance Statement on SAFE-T
A Tale of Two Task Forces: Evidence of a Growing Diversity Problem within Psychology?
In Their Own Words: Therapists Who Support a Client’s Right to Explore Sexual Attraction Fluidity Respond to Questions Posed by Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Therapists
Preparing the Foundation for the Curtailment of Religious Liberty: New Research Targets Conservative Religious Beliefs on Same-sex Sexuality
Recently Published Research Counters Claims of Widespread Harm and Ineffectiveness of Sexual Attraction Fluidity Exploration in Therapy (SAFE-T)
Perspectives from the Front Lines of Therapy Ban Conflicts: An Interview with Peter Sprigg and Greg Burt
A Research Review of Ryan et al.’s Parent-initiated Sex Orientation Change Efforts with LGBT Adolescents: Implications for Young Adult Mental Health and Adjustment
A Research Review of Gartrell et al.’s Sex Attraction, Sexual Identity, and Same-Sex Experiences of Adult Offspring in U.S. National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study
A Response to the UK Government’s Intended Ban on Therapeutic Choice
A Response to the UK Government’s Intended Ban on Therapeutic Choice
IFTCC Letter to Canadian MPs Nov 2020
IFTCC to UN HRC individual Submission to Victor Madrigal-Borloz
The Creation and Inflation of Prevalence Statistics: The Case of “Conversion Therapy”
A Critical Review of 2020 Research on Harms from Efforts to Change Sexual Attractions and Behaviors: Minimal Advancement of Science, Maximal Advancement of Agendas
Review of Mark A. Yarhouse’s (2019) Sexual Identity & Faith: Helping Clients Find Congruence
Researching Against the Cultural Tide: An Interview with Walter R. Schumm and D. Paul Sullins
2020 Journal of Human Sexuality, Volume 11
A Comprehensive Critical Review of the “2021 [American Psychological Association] APA Resolution on Sexual Orientation Change Efforts”
Assessing the Legal Landscape Regarding Therapy Bans: Three Perspectives from Three Experts from Three Continents
Ideological Gatekeeping or Quality Control? One Author’s Experience with Peer Review at the American Psychologist
The Right to Try Versus Closing of the Sexual Mind
Review of Douglas C. Haldeman’s (Ed.) The Case Against Conversion “Therapy”: Evidence, Ethics, and Alternatives
Protected: Expert Report on The Coalition Against Conversion Therapy Memorandum of Understanding on Conversation Therapy In the UK
Protected: IFTCC Contribution to UK Government Goals 18 April 2024

Related Entries